The short answer
Ravical and Fieldguide are tools from different categories. They overlap on ISO 27001. Neither has a clear edge on the figures we track (entry price, review ratings, integrations, frameworks, customers). Best fit: Ravical for accounting firms standardizing recurring client work across advisers and Fieldguide for top and mid-market accounting firms standardizing audit and advisory delivery across practices. Shortlist on fit, then compare quotes for the same scope.
Which should you choose?
Choose Ravical if…
- you're among accounting firms standardizing recurring client work across advisers
- you're among tax teams needing source-linked answers grounded in official legal and regulatory material
- you're among professional-services leaders governing AI access, data sources and output quality
- this Fieldguide drawback matters to you: pricing is quote-based, making budgeting difficult for smaller practices
Choose Fieldguide if…
- you're among top and mid-market accounting firms standardizing audit and advisory delivery across practices
- you're among assurance teams wanting AI-assisted planning, testing, review, and workpaper workflows
- you're among firms needing shared client evidence and request management instead of email-driven collection
- this Ravical drawback matters to you: pricing, contract terms and any free trial are not publicly disclosed
At a glance
| Attribute | Ravical | Fieldguide |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custompricing as of Nov 2026 | Custompricing as of Oct 2026 |
| Pricing model | Annual or recurring subscription, quote-based | Annual subscription, quote-based |
| Free trial | Request a demo. | No public free trial is listed; buyers request a demo. |
| Founded | 2025 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Ghent, Belgium | San Francisco, CA |
| Funding | $17M seed (October 2026) | $125M raised |
| Frameworks | ISO/IEC 27001:2022; GDPR | SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, HITRUST, ISO 27001, NIST, SOX, FedRAMP |
| Coverage | 100+ accounting firms; serves firms across Europe | Audit, advisory, assurance, internal audit, cybersecurity, privacy, regulatory compliance, and federal engagements |
| Integrations | AFAS CRM, AdminPulse, Loket, M-Files, Yuki, Nmbrs Payroll/Accounting, QuickBooks | 80+ accounting, HRIS, and ticketing systems |
| Customers | 100+ accounting firms | More than half of the Top 100 accounting firms |
| Rating | Not published | 4.4/5 on G2 (10 reviews) |
| Focus | AI workspace for accounting and professional-services firms | Audit and advisory engagement management |
Figures are as published by each vendor or review site on the verification date. "Leads" marks the stronger published figure; it isn't a recommendation on its own.
Where each one leads
Neither tool has a clear edge on the figures we can compare directly (entry price, review rating, integrations, frameworks, customers, free trial).
Pricing compared
Ravical pricing
Custom · pricing as of Nov 2026
- CustomContact sales
AI workspace, agents, workflows, integrations, governance and support configured for the firm
Ravical does not publish plan prices or a self-serve checkout. Pricing is handled through a sales conversation and is positioned around firm outcomes rather than seats or billable hours.
Free trial: Request a demo.
Fieldguide pricing
Custom · pricing as of Oct 2026
- Fieldguide platformCustom
Engagement management, client collaboration, workpapers, AI-assisted testing, reporting
Fieldguide sells through a sales-led process and does not publish current list prices. Buyers request a quote for the platform and implementation. Historical bundles used engagement-based pricing and are not a current price guide.
Free trial: No public free trial is listed; buyers request a demo.
Key capabilities
Ravical
- AI client workspace. Queries the client portfolio and combines financial, filing, document, email and firm knowledge into working context.
- Inbox Agent. Drafts client responses using internal systems, knowledge, tone and configurable guardrails, with quality digests for managers.
- Domain Knowledge. Retrieves relevant legal, tax and regulatory sources and links claims to the exact supporting passage.
- Workflow Library. Provides expert-built recurring workflows while allowing firms to add templates, standards and team processes.
- Portfolio monitoring. Scans clients for deadlines, risks, missing information and advisory or revenue opportunities.
- AI governance. AI Architects can inspect agent activity and data sources, set rules, restrict clients, block files and manage permissions.
- Outcome pricing. Identifies potential services and estimates fee ranges using the firm’s own pricing strategy.
Fieldguide
- AI engagement agents. Field Planner, Field Auditor, Field Reviewer, Field Financials, and Field Orchestrator prepare or execute repeatable work with practitioner checkpoints.
- Engagement management. Teams manage planning through completion with connected people, clients, methodology, status, risk, and open items.
- Client request hub. Clients view requests, upload evidence, exchange files, and collaborate through a shared permissioned workspace.
- Audit testing automation. Field Auditor analyzes populations, performs sampling and extraction, evaluates evidence, and surfaces exceptions.
- Workpaper management. Users store, organize, edit, version, and export Word, Excel, and PDF workpapers tied to engagements.
- Methodology support. Firms can deploy PPC, Mercia, CPA Canada, Thomson Reuters Guided Assurance, or proprietary methodology.
- Insights and analytics. Dashboards measure engagement efficiency, AI adoption, team performance, and time against budget.
Pros and cons
Ravical
Pros
- Connects client context from existing financial, CRM, document, payroll and communication systems.
- Shows agent plans, reasoning, sources and intervention points instead of presenting a wholly opaque answer.
- Combines productivity, workflow standardization, portfolio monitoring and revenue opportunity discovery.
- Publishes ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification and GDPR compliance claims for regulated-firm buyers.
Cons
- Pricing, contract terms and any free trial are not publicly disclosed.
- The platform is sales-led and may be too specialized for teams outside professional services.
- AI outputs remain subject to adviser review, so automation is not a substitute for professional judgment.
- Ravical does not publish independent review scores, accuracy benchmarks or a complete connector catalogue.
Fieldguide
Pros
- Covers planning, evidence collection, testing, review, reporting, and client collaboration in one platform.
- Field Agents support repeatable audit procedures while retaining professional review checkpoints.
- Integrates with GRC, accounting, HRIS, ticketing, identity, and file-sharing systems.
- Supports licensed and proprietary methodologies, including Thomson Reuters Guided Assurance.
Cons
- Pricing is quote-based, making budgeting difficult for smaller practices.
- The platform is designed for firms and engagement teams rather than individual auditors.
- AI-generated work remains subject to practitioner review and does not replace professional judgment.
- Advanced capabilities such as time-and-budget insights require an Enterprise subscription.
How they're similar
- Both list ISO 27001.
- Both use quote-based pricing, so the final price depends on scope and negotiation.
How they differ
- Focus
- Ravical: AI workspace for accounting and professional-services firms
- Fieldguide: Audit and advisory engagement management
- Pricing model
- Ravical: Annual or recurring subscription, quote-based
- Fieldguide: Annual subscription, quote-based
- Headquarters
- Ravical: Ghent, Belgium
- Fieldguide: San Francisco, CA
- Funding
- Ravical: $17M seed (October 2026)
- Fieldguide: $125M raised
- Listed only for this tool
- Ravical: Accounting, Tax, Payroll, Legal, Insurance, AI governance +5 more
- Fieldguide: SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, HITRUST, NIST, SOX +7 more
Frequently asked questions
Is Ravical cheaper than Fieldguide?
+
The published prices can't be compared directly (they are quote-based, use different billing units, or aren't published), so request quotes for the same scope. Ravical: Custom (annual or recurring subscription, quote-based). Fieldguide: Custom (annual subscription, quote-based). (Ravical pricing pricing as of Nov 2026; Fieldguide pricing pricing as of Oct 2026.) Total cost depends on plan, company size and add-ons.
Which is better for startups, Ravical or Fieldguide?
+
Ravical's published positioning doesn't single out startups; its first best-fit group is "Accounting firms standardizing recurring client work across advisers". Fieldguide's published positioning doesn't single out startups; its first best-fit group is "Top and mid-market accounting firms standardizing audit and advisory delivery across practices". Neither answer replaces a quote for your headcount and scope.
Can I switch from Ravical to Fieldguide?
+
Yes. They are separate products, so switching means setting up Fieldguide and reconnecting your systems. Check your Ravical contract term and renewal date before you commit. Data migration tooling isn't covered in our sources, so ask Fieldguide whether it can import your Ravical data.
Does Ravical or Fieldguide have more integrations?
+
Ravical: AFAS CRM, AdminPulse, Loket, M-Files, Yuki, Nmbrs Payroll/Accounting, QuickBooks; Fieldguide: 80+ accounting, HRIS, and ticketing systems. Vendor counts are self-reported and define "integration" differently, so check that the specific systems you use are supported.
How do Ravical and Fieldguide reviews compare?
+
Ravical: no rating in our data; Fieldguide scores 4.4/5 from 10 reviews on G2. Ratings are third-party review-site data, not our own testing.
Do Ravical and Fieldguide offer a free trial?
+
Ravical: Request a demo. Fieldguide: No public free trial is listed; buyers request a demo.
Go deeper
Ravical
Tax & Accounting
Fieldguide
Audit & Risk
Sources
Vendors change pricing and features often, so confirm with each vendor before buying. How we research
Ravical
Last verified
Work at one of these companies or spot something out of date? Suggest a correction. We check every report against a public source and update the page, usually within a few days.